In Association with Amazon.com



A B C D E F G
H I J K L M N
O P Q R S T U
V W X Y Z *
WE ARE NOW SEEKING NEW PEOPLE TO WRITE REVIEWS
Details...


Title Search:

List All Reviews
New Reviews

Join Us!
Video Store
Reviews
Daily Dose
Games
Forum
Site of the Week
Home


About this Site
Contact Us

Disclaimer

The 100




Caligula
(1980)
Reviewed by Ned Daigle
Rating: 9 Beans

n the history of film, there have been bad ideas and there have been BAD ideas. The film that begs the question "What in the hell were they thinking?" the most has to be the Roman fiasco "Caligula", and that does count the singing paperboys of "Newsies" and Laurence Olivier being cast as General MacArthur in "Inchon".

"Penthouse" magazine publisher Bob Guccione chunked down almost $20 million to bring his "vision" of Ancient Rome to the screen. This should have been an altogether obvious bad sign to all. But somehow Bob snagged Gore Vidal to write the screenplay and was able to woo big talent like Malcolm McDowell, John Gielgud, Peter O'Toole, and Helen Mirren to round out his cast.

McDowell plays the Emperor Caligula who was infamous for his powermad reign. And, basically, the film is a chronicle of his insane rule. There's no real plot to speak of, just a series of disgusting vignettes to drive the point home, "This guy is totally insane." Duh. What distinguishes "Caligula" from being a run-of-the-mill bad epic and makes it sheer bad movie nirvana is the mind-boggling amounts of sex and gore.

We've all seen our share of sex and violence in films but "Caligula" really takes the cake. The gore quotient is real high, and it's not even fun gore. It's the torturous, nauseating kind of violence. Like what you ask? Well, let's see. At one point Caligula ties off a soldier's urinary tract, forces him to drink gallons of wine until his stomach distends and then runs him through with a sword. He orders one man to be castrated, and the genitals are then fed to dogs (in loving close up). There is a bloody birth scene. More beheadings and throat slashings than I can count. And even a small child's head is smashed on some stone steps. Yuck.

And the sex? Not just your ordinary soft-core humping. No no no. We're talking full pornographic sex. Of every persuasion. In detail and close-up. At first, I'll admit, it was kind of a cheap thrill. But after endless scenes of oral sex, rape, lesbianism, incest and even necrophilia (don't ask) it just really wears you down.

McDowell is very over the top in his performance. With a character as perverse and evil as Caligula, who could blame him? Gielgud (Nerva) and O'Toole (Tiberius) are thankfully brief, being knocked off early, but that means a lot of really bad foreign performers hog much of the screen time. The biggest offender is Teresa Ann Savoy as Drusilla, Caligula's sister. She can't even play dead very convincingly, which in this film also means she will be naked for the camera to linger on her crotch.

At a mind-numbing 155 min*, "Caligula" is, admittedly, easy to sit through, because you will be in awe, wondering what in the hell will be on the screen next. But as competent filmmaking, it is just a big piece of excrement. What were they thinking, indeed. Is it any wonder that writer Vidal, and director Tinto Brass (who?) both had their names removed from the credits?


*Special note: It is nearly impossible to come across the original 155 min cut of this film. The R-rated version at 104 min (that's a whopping 51 min of X rated material) is more commonly found. Now, this version does hone down the film into a more cohesive narrative without most of the extraneous garbage; however, it becomes clearer how much worse the screenplay, directing and acting really are. So there really is no bean difference, they are equally painful but in somewhat different ways.






"Bad Movie Night" is a presentation of
Hit-n-Run Productions, © 1997-2006,
a subsidiary of Syphon Interactive, LLC.

Site created and managed by Ken and Scoot