In Association with Amazon.com



A B C D E F G
H I J K L M N
O P Q R S T U
V W X Y Z *
WE ARE NOW SEEKING NEW PEOPLE TO WRITE REVIEWS
Details...


Title Search:

List All Reviews
New Reviews

Join Us!
Video Store
Reviews
Daily Dose
Games
Forum
Site of the Week
Home


About this Site
Contact Us

Disclaimer

The 100




Cats & Dogs
(2001)
Reviewed by Ned Daigle
Rating: 9 Beans

hodathunkit? After suffering though "Freddy Got Fingered", I popped in "Cats & Dogs" expecting to be, if not thoroughly delighted, to at least become bemused with childhood whimsy. What I didn't expect, was a nearly unwatchable and totally insipid insult to the intelligence. I don't know how fair I can be in this review, since I got so absolutely disgusted with "Cats & Dogs" that I turned it off and didn't even bother finishing it. Yup, it's that wretched.

Now, some people will claim that I'm biased, because, after all, "Cats & Dogs" is a children's movie, and I am not a child. That is a bogus argument. Truly great children's movies can transcend that age barrier. Some of the most beloved films of all time are children's movies, from "The Wizard of Oz" to "Willy Wonka" to "The Lion King" and on up to other modern classics like "Chicken Run", "Babe" and "Shrek". The state of a lot of children's movies these days is, actually, very depressing, because the more classy and intelligent the movie is the less likely parents will actually take their kids to see it. Why go see truly great children's fare like "The Indian in the Cupboard", "A Little Princess" or "The Secret Garden" (expensive box-office flops all) when you can go see steaming piles of brain-numbing crap like "Pokemon", "See Spot Run", "Dr. Dolittle", "Home Alone" or, yes, "Cats & Dogs".

The blame for "Cats & Dogs"'s failure sits squarely on the shoulders of the screenwriters (debut, and hopefully adieu, for writers John Requa and Glenn Ficarra). Obviously they pitched their idea to a studio with: "It's a kid's movie about a war between cats and dogs! We'll have celebrity voices! And use the same kind of talking animal effects like "Babe"! The script will write itself! It'll be a smash!" Anyway, all the money was spent on the effects and the script was definitely written on autopilot.

"Cats & Dogs" is, indeed, about a war between cats and dogs. Why? Well, a hapless doctor (a slumming Jeff Goldblum) is developing a cure for dog/human allergies, which will tip the scales in favor of dogs. And the cats, well, they want to stop it and take over the world..or something.

Basically, the film is just one endless series of cat vs. dog mini-altercations. You see, it's supposed to be kind of a "Mission: Impossible" kind of spoof what with the animals acting as secret agents and spies with top secret control panels hidden in doghouses and kitty assassins and such.

There are just too many problems with the whole premise. There is just enough gadgetry and 007-style references to confuse younger audiences, but not enough, not NEARLY enough, cohesion to the story to make older audiences give a crap about how it'll turn out. Characters come and go at random, and it's never really explained exactly how the dogs and cats actually acquired, let alone, are able to do such things as access computers, drive trucks, fly planes etc. It's just a given I guess.

Along with the stupifyingly half-baked plot, I just wonder why the filmmakers aimed so LOW in the humor department. If you aren't going to bother taking the story seriously, at least make it funny, and maybe audiences won't realize there isn't one. But no. The comedy here is pitched right at the 6 year-olds in the audience. No one over the age of 8 or 9 could possibly find one laugh anywhere within its 89 minute running time. There is more clumsily handled slapstick, fart jokes, dog-crap jokes and groan-inducing puns than any intelligent person can possibly stand.

The celebrity voice performances for most of the animals are pretty bland and uninspired. The only one able to rise above this drivel is Sean Hayes (Jack on "Will & Grace") who voices the lead bad cat, Mr. Tinkles. He is somewhat entertaining, but then again, the villain usually is. Others include Tobey Maguire, Alec Baldwin, Susan Sarandon, Jon Lovitz and Charleton Heston, all to no benefit.

Also, being a "cat person" myself, I was slightly offended at how anti-cat the movie is. Dogs are the heroes, cats are the evil villains. Period.

Whatever.

All I can say is, I pity the poor parents who, when it was released on video, were suckered into purchasing this idiotic waste of celluloid for their kids. Because, we all know how kids like to watch movies over, and over, and over, and over, and over again. It'll be like "Cats & Dogs" on and endless loop.

*Shudder*






"Bad Movie Night" is a presentation of
Hit-n-Run Productions, © 1997-2006,
a subsidiary of Syphon Interactive, LLC.

Site created and managed by Ken and Scoot